Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Executive Session topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Joint Corning and Villisca boards vote to enter closed session to evaluate professional competency of an individual
Summary
At a special joint session March 17, 2025, Corning and Villisca boards unanimously approved a motion to enter a closed session under Section 21.5(1)(i) of the open meetings law to evaluate the professional competency of an individual who requested a closed session; closed session ran from 4:29–5:34 p.m.
Get email alerts on the Personnel Executive Session topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Boards of Education of the Corning Community School District and the Villisca Community School District met in a special joint session March 17, 2025, in the Southwest Valley High School board room. Corning board president Staci Venteicher called the meeting to order at 4:28 p.m. and noted board members and staff in attendance.
Corning board member Stephanie Hodapp moved that the boards hold a closed session “as provided in Section 21.5(1)(i) of the open meetings law to evaluate the professional competency of an individual whose appointment, hiring, performance or discharge is being considered when necessary to prevent needless and irreparable injury to that individual’s reputation, as that individual has requested a closed session.” Adam Boswell seconded the motion. By roll call vote the motion carried; the minutes record Yes votes from Howard Anderson, Adam Boswell, Stephanie Hodapp, Trent Roberts and Staci Venteicher, and No votes: none.
The boards entered closed session at 4:29 p.m. and returned to open session at 5:34 p.m. The transcript records no additional public actions or votes after the return to open session. Hodapp moved and Boswell seconded a motion to adjourn, which carried unanimously; the meeting adjourned at 5:42 p.m.
The transcript identifies board secretaries Jodi Lyddon and Jessie Forsythe and consultant Bob Olson of EdWise Consulting as present. The minutes do not disclose the identity of the individual whose professional competency was evaluated; the motion states that the individual had requested a closed session. No disciplinary action, appointment, or other outcome is recorded in the public portion of the minutes.
