Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Waiver requests and permit‑extension fees spark hours‑long Lago Vista council debate; council to agendize fee‑reduction action
Summary
A homeowner requested a tree mitigation fee waiver and Lago Homes representatives sought reduction of a permit‑extension/roadway fee they call a double charge; staff and the city attorney said current ordinances provide no administrative waiver and recommended an ordinance or P&Z/BOA path; several councilmembers indicated support for agendizing a fee‑reduction action on Feb. 19.
A broad set of land‑use and permit fee issues dominated much of the workshop as residents and builders asked for relief from city fee calculations and staff and legal counsel explained how existing ordinances constrain relief.
Kenneth Belair asked the council to waive a $750 tree mitigation fee for three trees removed at 20902 Monroe Cove, saying his arborist’s measurements showed the trees were under the protected diameter threshold. Jordan (development staff) told the council the permit file recorded a contractor’s acknowledgement of the fee and that the city bases mitigation on a certified tree survey submitted with the permit: ‘‘if you have a tree survey and it shows that they're under, then the replacement does not apply,’’ Jordan said, while noting the burden is on the owner to provide certified documentation.
A separate, lengthier dispute involved Lago Homes, represented by Ralph, who requested the council reduce what he described as a duplicative street/impact charge after a building permit expired and an extension was assessed. Jordan and the city attorney explained the code treats a permit fee and the extension fee as distinct and that staff lacks administrative authority to waive fees set by Appendix A; Brad said changing that practice would require an ordinance amendment. Several councilmembers expressed sympathy and a desire to resolve the matter quickly — Councilmember Benefield and others said they would support placing a reduction/waiver action on the Feb. 19 council agenda so the builder can complete final inspections, but staff cautioned about legal constraints on retroactive fee waivers and about the need for consistent, transparent policy.
Council directed staff and legal counsel to research options, prepare any necessary ordinance language, and return with a proposed path forward. Mayor Som said he would place a fee‑reduction item on the Feb. 19 agenda so council can consider the request in an action meeting.
