Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council reviews multiple fee and rate proposals and final budget adjustments; several items continued or clarified

Virgin Town Council · June 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council briefly reviewed a water conservancy-district rate increase (hearing moved to July), cemetery fee proposals, a new community-development/sign fee schedule, a possible 0.1% resort-tax increase, and final budget amendments; staff were asked to itemize fees per state code and to meet with council members for budget clarifications.

At its June 10 work meeting, the Virgin Town Council reviewed a suite of rate and fee items and the town’s final budget amendments for the fiscal year.

Staff reported the public hearing for a water-conservancy-district rate increase had been omitted from the published notice and the matter will be continued to July; staff noted the town can make the rate effective July 1 because billing occurs at month end.

Carolyn presented proposed cemetery fee increases, which the council had discussed in March; those fees are scheduled for a public hearing. Shila presented a new community-development fee schedule, including encroachment and right-of-way permits and a sign-fee schedule tied to the town’s 2025 sign ordinance. Council members requested clearer itemization and a fee‑appeal reference in line with state code so applicants can see calculation methods and appeal routes.

Council also discussed a proposed 0.1-percentage‑point resort‑tax increase (from 1.0% toward a 1.1% statutory cap); staff said a half‑percentage increase above that would require an election. Finance staff (Mark and Candace) presented final budget adjustments: revenues were about $245,000 ahead of budgeted estimates and operating expenditures were projected to come in roughly $289,000 under budget when capital projects were excluded. Staff explained the program-generated projected columns and reclassifications for capital outlay and offered to meet one‑on‑one with council members to clarify line items before formal adoption.

Next steps: hearing continuations and public hearings will be scheduled; staff will itemize fee calculations per state code (and provide fee-appeal process details) and meet individually with council members on budget questions.