Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission inspects five New Marlborough properties during May site visits; no actions taken
Summary
The commission inspected five properties May 14 (recorded at a May 15 meeting) covering a buffer-zone violation, pool removal in a riverfront area, an amended Notice of Intent, new-home construction, and a patio installation. No motions or votes were taken.
The commission conducted on-site inspections of five New Marlborough properties related to compliance and development, the minutes show. The inspections were carried out May 14 and recorded at a meeting called to order at 10:00 a.m. on May 15, 2026; commission members John Schreiber, Nancy Hannan and Doug Hyde were listed as present, and Kristin Hoffman and Freddy Friedman were listed as absent.
The first site visit was to 186 Knight Road (Parcel Id: 402-6), listed in the minutes with the owner surname Haiss. The commission reviewed a prior violation and an enforcement letter concerning added fill in the buffer zone; the owner was present for the inspection. The minutes do not record any motions or enforcement votes at the meeting.
At 549 Hartsville NM Road (Parcel Id: 104-6, Bernstein), representatives from SK Design Group filed a Request for Determination of Applicability (RDA) to remove an existing pool located in the riverfront area. Megan was present on behalf of the owner for the site visit; the minutes do not record any formal action.
The commission inspected 1277 Hartsville MR Road (Parcel Id: 104-6, Merkel), where White Engineering Inc. presented an amendment to a Notice of Intent (NOI). The amendment covers installing a fence, paving a driveway, running electrical and propane lines to a pool, and removing additional vegetation. The owner and Shannon Boosma attended the visit; no motions or votes were recorded.
Foresight Land Services attended the inspection at 62 Hadsell Street (Parcel Id: 410-132, Rose) regarding a Notice of Intent for new home construction. Mia Giardina represented Foresight at the site visit. The minutes show the matter was inspected but do not record any decision.
Finally, the commission visited 114 Downs Road (Parcel Id: 102-11, Siegel) to review plans from M D Amsted and Associates for the installation of a patio; Mark Amsted was present for that visit. As with the other items, the minutes state no motions were made and no votes taken.
The recorded minutes list the attendees and note that these site inspections were conducted for fact-finding and review; no formal actions were taken at the meeting and no dates for follow-up or enforcement votes are specified in the minutes.
