Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Mandeville zoning commission denies Alquists' variance for West Beach Parkway pool

Mandeville Zoning Commission ยท March 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Mandeville Zoning Commission on March 24 denied a variance request from William and Caroline Alquist for a West Beach Parkway property, citing setback and hardship concerns; the vote was unanimous and written notice will be filed the following day.

The Mandeville Zoning Commission denied a variance request from William and Caroline Alquist for a property on West Beach Parkway at its March 24 meeting. Planner Alex Weiner presented the application (V26-03-05), saying that relocating the proposed pool reduced the number of variances the applicants needed, but commissioners questioned whether the applicants had demonstrated a legal hardship.

Commissioners focused on the street-side yard setback and noted that the property has two driveways, which factored into their assessment of whether a variance was warranted. Public comment on the petition was recorded from Ren Clark. After discussion, Commissioner Karen Gautreaux moved to deny the variance; Commissioner Scott Quillin seconded and the motion passed unanimously (five in favor, zero opposed). Commissioners recorded as present for the vote were Nicholas Cressy, Karen Gautreaux, Scott Quillin, Brian Rhinehart and Patrick Rosenow.

The petition sought relief from CLURO Section 5.2.3.2 (Drainage Overlay District and Fill Sub-Area A), Section 9.2.5.2 (Vegetation Protection Zones) and Section 8.1.5 (Supplemental Regulation of Accessory Buildings and Structures). Chairman Brian Rhinehart also announced that written notice of the commission's decision will be filed in the commission office the following day, at which time the applicable appeal period will begin to run.

No formal amendment or alternative motion was adopted. The decision was recorded in the meeting minutes and the video of the session is posted by the city.