Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Abita Springs delays final zoning vote, extends public comment after debate over post office and 14‑lot development rule
Summary
Councilors continued a detailed review of a proposed zoning map and ordinance language, debated downzoning near Hickory/Maple to protect older homes, questioned whether a leased post office parcel should be 'civic' or mixed-use, and set a public-comment cutoff and timeline for revised maps and a future vote.
The Abita Springs Board of Aldermen continued deliberations on a proposed zoning map and associated ordinance language, asking staff and the consultant to gather more public input while several aldermen urged final action.
Council members and residents discussed numerous specifics, including a proposed downzoning on the North Hickory/Maple corner to reflect an overwhelmingly residential neighborhood and protect older homes. One council member recommended changing bordering parcels to lighter mixed-use while removing intense commercial designations nearer the river.
The board also debated how to classify the leased post office parcel: some members favored retaining a civic designation to preserve parking and the post office functions, while others — including a council member with commercial expertise — suggested mixed-use or commercial would better reflect long-term options. Staff said the property-owner mailing addresses were notified by mail and that zoning choices could be revisited later if a new use was proposed.
A technical question arose about whether the 14‑lot threshold that triggers a different billing or infrastructure treatment was an arbitrary figure; staff and other officials said the number appears in subdivision regulations and sanitation rules and helps to distinguish minor infill from major subdivisions that require different systems. The council discussed the administrative challenges of applying changes to every new lot versus focusing on larger subdivisions.
To allow time for more public input and final adjustments, staff proposed a deadline of June 5 for public comments, a July 8 deliverable to the consultant (Desire Line), reintroduction of an edited map on July 21 and an anticipated adoption vote at the Aug. 18 meeting, subject to advertising requirements. Several members urged not to postpone indefinitely and to set a firm "line in the sand" to complete the process.
Staff committed to follow up on legal/appeal procedures, fire-department impacts for different zoning designations, and additional outreach to affected property owners before returning to council.
