Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Update topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Abita Springs aldermen defer comprehensive rezoning after hours of public comment on Allen Road and Pratt's Trucking
Summary
Aldermen heard hours of public comment April 21 on a proposed town-wide rezoning and several contested parcels, including the Allen Road/435 node and Pratt's Trucking. Staff will revise the draft code and map; council deferred action to a later meeting for further review.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Update topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Abita Springs aldermen postponed final action on a townwide rezoning ordinance after a lengthy town-hall meeting on April 21 that focused on several contested parcels and code edits.
The ordinance under review, instrument 2026-02-02, would replace existing zoning tables and adopt a new map and code intended to align zoning with the town's master plan, planners said. Staff briefed the council and a packed public gallery on recent edits to the draft map and code and asked the council to weigh in on a set of targeted —decision points.—
Why it matters: The map and code would redraw which parcels are available for commercial, mixed-use and residential development across Abita Springs and change how future projects are reviewed — with implications for property owners, neighborhood character and town revenues.
Residents spent much of the meeting urging aldermen to preserve residential zoning in the Allen Road/435 area. "There are no city services over there; it is a flood-prone area," resident Scott Payne told the council, saying commercial uses such as gas stations and car washes are incompatible with nearby homes and shallow water wells. Several neighbors also cited school routes and safety near Abita Springs Elementary.
Town planner Alex and planning staff responded that the draft map seeks balance. Alex said the planning commission's recommendation generally favors mixed-use at certain nodes to accommodate small-scale businesses while protecting adjacent residential areas, and that the proposed map preserves legal nonconforming uses where businesses already operate.
On Pratt's Trucking, which operates a truck and heavy-equipment yard on a parcel residents said has functioned in that way for decades, staff said the proposed map keeps the property in a residential category that leaves the existing business as a legal nonconforming use. "If we keep the district mapped as proposed, you would add the commercial truck and heavy equipment yard as a conditional use allowed in the conservation residential," Alex said when explaining possible code options to allow the business to continue while protecting neighbors.
Several council members echoed that approach as a compromise. "Mixed use would be the happy medium," one alderman said, noting it reduces the intensity of uses that would otherwise be allowed under full commercial zoning.
Code changes discussed included new use standards for microbreweries to require pretreatment of wastewater, a proposal to raise the size threshold for certain mixed-use buildings from 4,000 to 6,000 square feet within the mixed-use district (with tighter limits in residential mixed-use), and treatment of level-three EV chargers as conditional in mixed-use or permitted in commercial districts. Planners also proposed moving the sign standards to a later draft for separate review.
What the council did: Council members voted to defer action on the ordinance and accept a revised code and map for reintroduction at the next meeting. Staff outlined a tentative schedule: replace the current draft with a new tracked draft at the May meeting, provide required public notice, and consider adoption in June. The motion to defer passed on a voice vote.
Next steps: Staff will publish a revised draft with tracked changes and schedule the item for reintroduction; the council signaled it will aim to substitute the full revised version at the next meeting and then lay it over for the statutory notice period before final action.
Council and planning staff asked residents and business owners to review the updated permitted-use tables online and to submit specific, parcel-level feedback so staff can prepare precise amendments for future votes.

