Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Historic preservation commission approves service window at 965 Manitou Avenue

Manitou Springs Historic Preservation Commission · July 2, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Manitou Springs Historic Preservation Commission on July 1 approved MCAC 2610 to replace a first-floor window at 965 Manitou Avenue with a double-hung, wood-clad unit specified by staff; the applicant was not present and public comment favored a wood appearance over a white vinyl sliding window.

The Manitou Springs Historic Preservation Commission voted unanimously July 1 to approve MCAC 2610, allowing replacement of a first-floor window at 965 Manitou Avenue to create a service window.

Aaron Rings, planner and landscape architect for the city, said the property is a contributing resource in the commercial-core historic subdistrict and that the existing display/transom features are not listed as contributing elements. "The proposal is the replacement of one first-floor window for the purposes of meeting the requirements for a service window," Rings said.

The applicant was not present. During public comment, John French said he was concerned that a white vinyl sliding window would be out of character and urged the commission to prefer a configuration that matches the historic look. "Vinyl almost always comes in white," French said, adding he preferred the double-hung option rather than a sliding sash.

Vice Chair Matthew Murphy and other commissioners questioned materials and consistency with adjacent street-facing windows. Staff noted the packet included two vendor options: a Pella sliding vinyl block-frame and a clad pine double-opening unit; the double-opening unit was shown as clad pine in the specifications. Commissioners favored the double-hung, wood-clad style as more historically consistent and moved to approve the case "as proposed" while specifying the double-hung specification shown in the packet.

The commission closed the public hearing and recorded a 4–0 vote in favor of MCAC 2610. The decision includes the selection of the double-hung option per the staff packet; no additional staff conditions were specified in the motion.

Next steps: the decision is final unless appealed through the city clerk’s office within 10 days.