Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves two conditional use permits for recovery home and River Road event venue

Halifax County Board of Supervisors · June 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Halifax County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved a Conditional Use Permit for Hope Center Ministries to operate a 12‑month residential male substance‑abuse recovery program and approved a separate CUP for a wedding venue and small concerts on River Road, both with site conditions.

The Halifax County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved two Conditional Use Permits on June 1: one for a 12-month residential recovery program proposed by Discipleship Holdings, Inc. (Hope Center Ministries) and another for a wedding venue and small concerts proposed by James E. Edmunds III.

Planning and Zoning Administrator Detrick Easley said the Planning Commission recommended approval of both applications subject to site-specific conditions. For Hope Center Ministries, the Planning Commission proposed 18 conditions addressing site security, staffing and camera coverage; applicant representative Justin Capps was present to answer questions. The board voted to approve the CUP for the recovery home with the 18 listed site conditions (motion passed 8-0).

A second CUP requested by James E. Edmunds III would allow a wedding venue and small concerts at a River Road property (PRN 11896). Easley said no citizens spoke in favor or opposition during the joint public hearing and that the proposed structure's setback was discussed; zoning requires a minimum 75-foot setback and the structure was described during hearings as approximately 250 feet from the road. The board approved the CUP with 23 site conditions (motion passed 8-0).

Both approvals were consistent with Planning Commission recommendations and included multiple conditions intended to address traffic, noise, and site design. Neither approval included further board-imposed modifications beyond the conditions listed in the agenda packet.