Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bolton PZC discusses zoning, subdivision changes to implement state 'as‑of‑right' housing review
Summary
Staff and commissioners discussed revising the Bolton Subdivision and Zoning Regulations to comply with new state housing legislation requiring summary ("as of right") review for certain 2–9 unit housing developments; commissioners raised affordability, traffic, water-supply and design concerns and scheduled a May 27 special meeting to continue work.
The Bolton Planning & Zoning Commission continued work on May 13 to revise the town’s subdivision and zoning regulations so they comply with recent state housing legislation that requires summary review, or “as of right” approval, for certain housing developments.
Patrice Carson, AICP, consulting director of community development, told the commission that she and M. D’Amato are preparing updates intended to allow projects that meet defined standards to proceed without a public hearing or site plan approval. The changes under consideration would apply to smaller developments, generally those containing two to nine units; larger projects would continue to require site plan review.
Commission discussion focused on potential standards including setbacks, parking placement, building types, design elements, screening and buffering. Commissioners cautioned that some architectural requirements and rising construction costs can drive up housing prices, making affordability a concern while also noting the need to evaluate traffic impacts and water‑supply capacity.
Staff asked commissioners to submit written comments and stated a goal of adopting initial regulations by July 1, 2026, with revisions possible afterward. The commission discussed scheduling a special meeting on Wednesday, May 27 at 7:30 p.m. to continue the housing regulation amendments.
No formal vote was taken on the subdivision or zoning changes at this meeting; the discussion produced direction to staff to draft standards for future review.
