Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge stricter building‑permit enforcement amid floodplain concerns at St. Francois County meeting
Summary
During public comment residents pressed the commission to improve notice and enforcement of building permits, warning that properties in mapped floodplains can lose financing or face high insurance costs; officials said notices run in the paper and are posted online but discussed limits on local enforcement where planning and zoning do not apply.
Residents used the public-comment period to press the St. Francois County Commission to step up outreach and enforcement around building permits, saying failing to obtain required permits can lead to costly insurance and financing problems for homeowners.
A resident identified in the meeting as Dave asked how the county communicates the permit requirement: "Is it just on your website? You're going to put it in the paper? What are we doing here?" Officials responded that notices are run in the local paper and posted on the county website and said they were discussing additional outreach to contractors and lumber suppliers.
Commenters warned about floodplain risks. One speaker with banking experience said owners sometimes discover, when seeking financing, that their properties are in a mapped floodplain and then must purchase flood insurance that can cost more than their mortgage. Meeting participants also noted that parts of the county lack planning and zoning authority; that limitation means the county has limited legal ability to enforce some permit requirements in areas without zoning.
Commissioners and staff urged residents to obtain permits (the fee was described as nominal at about $20) so the county can perform a floodplain check and prevent downstream problems. Officials acknowledged enforcement challenges where local planning and zoning are absent, and they said stronger public education and targeted outreach to contractors were under consideration.
The discussion did not result in a new ordinance or enforcement action at the meeting; it was recorded as public comment and informational exchange. Commission staff said they would consider additional outreach methods and review existing notification channels.
