Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Demolition Roundup topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Southampton landmarks board issues no‑objection responses for several derelict properties, notes demolition‑by‑neglect trend

Town of Southampton Landmarks and Historic Districts Board · June 30, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the June 30 meeting the landmarks board recorded no objections to multiple demolition or replacement applications (including 29 West End Avenue, 67 Bayes Avenue, 5 Lincoln Avenue, and 196 Big Fresh Pond Road) after site reports showed extensive neglect; staff were instructed to prepare routine responses and to note several cases of demolition‑by‑neglect.

The Town of Southampton Landmarks and Historic Districts Board on June 30 reviewed a slate of demolition and renovation applications and, where the board determined structures were severely deteriorated or of limited historic significance, issued no‑objection responses or delegated staff to prepare responses.

Items covered included:

- 29 West End Avenue (East Quogue): a circa‑1851 dwelling with visible deterioration; after site documentation and discussion the board recorded no objection to demolition.

- 67 Bayes Avenue (West Hampton) and other Culvertown‑area houses: inspectors documented water intrusion, collapsed roofs, and mold; the board found little salvage potential and approved a no‑objection response, while noting concern about demolition‑by‑neglect across the town.

- 5 Lincoln Avenue (Hampton Bays) and several pre‑1941 cottages: extensive damage and poor condition led the board to direct staff to send no‑objection responses where appropriate.

- 221 Little Fresh Pond Road (detached garage): the applicant had already removed and replaced a garage structure prior to full review; the board noted the work was complete and asked staff to inform the building department and include photographic evidence in the response.

- 196 Big Fresh Pond Road (circa 1940): proposed renovation and second‑floor addition were reviewed and the board recorded no objection, finding the cottage lacked particular historic merit.

Board members expressed regret at the number of properties reaching demolition through vacancy and neglect and encouraged salvage of any worthwhile elements where practical. For installations already completed without prior review (notably the 221 Little Fresh Pond garage), staff were instructed to inform the building department and document the case in the board response.