Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mendon Township board raises Dale Hutson’s pay to $2,500 amid land-division concern
Summary
The Mendon Township Board on Dec. 2 approved a pay increase for Dale Hutson to $2,500 per month and heard his notice of a Dec. 9 board of review and a request involving a land-division boundary and an easement for a proposed sale.
Get email alerts on the Personnel Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
MENDON — The Mendon Township Board voted Dec. 2 to raise the monthly pay for Dale Hutson to $2,500.
Supervisor Kline told Hutson he would propose boosting the pay “to $2500.00 per month,” and Hutson had earlier said his requested rate was "$2073.00 per month." Treasurer Jan Griffith moved to increase Hutson’s monthly pay to $2,500, Trustee Jim Hart supported the motion, and the board carried it.
The action came during floor business after Hutson said a board of review will be held Dec. 9 in the township library basement. Hutson described a land-division inquiry for property owned by Sandra and Wayne Wilds in the southeast part of the village, saying a surveyor believes the parcel boundaries may be inaccurate. Hutson said a portion of the parcel may be village property but is currently assessed as township property; the Wilds’ surveyor requested an easement for a road to enable the proposed division and sale. The board received a map from Hutson and legal descriptions from Mostrom.
Why it matters: the pay increase formalizes the board’s compensation for a township employee or official and the land-division and easement question could affect local property boundaries and future development plans. The board did not record a roll-call vote or provide a roll call tally in the meeting minutes; the minutes state only that the motion was carried.
Board action and next steps: the board approved the salary increase immediately. Hutson noted rising property taxes for 2026 and the board received the land-division materials; no formal easement decision or vote on the Wilds’ boundary question was recorded at the meeting.
