Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Foreign Gifts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Presenter calls Cutter's plane gift to Trump an 'illegal, unconstitutional' payoff
Summary
A media presenter alleged that Cutter is funding a retrofit paid with taxpayer dollars so President Trump could keep a plane, calling it potentially illegal and unconstitutional and estimating the gift at about $400 million while warning that a foreign government could gain detailed access to the presidential aircraft.
A presenter in a media segment accused Cutter of arranging a taxpayer-funded retrofit of Air Force One so the aircraft could be transferred to President Trump’s library and effectively kept by the former president. The presenter said the deal amounted to a foreign payoff of roughly $400 million and warned of potential national-security risks.
The presenter framed the reported arrangement as ethically and legally problematic, saying, "This appears to be an illegal, unconstitutional payoff from a foreign [music] government on the order of $400 million." The segment described Cutter as paying "hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars" to retrofit the plane and said the aircraft "will then be transferred ... to the president's library when he leaves office."
The presenter emphasized the scale and implications of the transfer, calling it "likely the largest gift ever from a foreign government" and asserting the Qatari government would "know all [music] the ins and outs of the plane that houses the US president." The segment also included the line, "Cutter is giving us a plane that Trump gets to keep," and an aside about the temptation to accept free things: "I could be a stupid [music] person to say, 'Oh, no, we don't want a free plane.' We get free things out, we'll take one, too."
The segment packaged these claims as a mix of ethical, legal and security concerns but did not cite a statute, regulation, court decision, or an official government finding. The presenter labeled the arrangement "corrupt," saying, "This is no bargain. It's not even a corrupt [music] bargain. It's just corrupt." No response from Cutter, the Qatari government, or any government official appears in the segment.
The segment did not identify a legal authority for the claim that the arrangement is illegal or unconstitutional; the $400 million figure was presented as an estimate. Without cited authorities or responses from implicated parties, the assertions in the segment remain allegations rather than adjudicated findings.
