Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Assessment Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State education commissioner outlines HB 257 rollout, procurement timeline for college entrance exam
Summary
Commissioner Dr. Robbie Fletcher told the EARS subcommittee the state released an RFP May 21 for a college entrance exam vendor, with proposals due June 22 and an expected award no earlier than October; he also described how House Bill 257 creates locally developed indicators of quality and changes state accountability to emphasize student growth and chronic absenteeism.
Dr. Robbie Fletcher, Kentucky's commissioner of education, told the Education Assessment Accountability Review Subcommittee the Kentucky Department of Education is moving through an "unbiased procurement process" to select a college entrance exam for the coming school year.
Fletcher said the RFP for the college-entrance assessment was published May 21; vendors submitted written questions May 28, the Commonwealth responded June 5, and proposals were due June 22. "The earliest that we'll have one in place will be October," he said, noting the finance administration cabinet oversees scoring and contract negotiations.
The commissioner emphasized the difference between a norm-referenced college entrance exam (used to compare students nationally) and the Kentucky Summative Assessment (KSA), which measures Kentucky Academic Standards. "The college entrance exam doesn't assess content or academic standards; that's what the KSA is for," Fletcher said. He added that meeting college-readiness benchmarks on an exam is only one pathway to being considered "transition ready," alongside dual credit, industry credentials and other options.
On statutory implementation, Fletcher summarized two HB 257 tracks: the state accountability formula that meets federal requirements and the new locally developed indicators of quality. "We want districts to develop their own indicators of quality," he said, listing examples such as project-based learning, internships and locally relevant measures (for example, how funds are spent). KDE will publish a design toolkit and provide technical assistance, and the legislature authorized a one-time cost offset (presented in committee materials as $15,000) for districts adopting local models.
Fletcher outlined changes to the statewide accountability model under HB 257: the system will emphasize individual student growth rather than cohort comparisons, replace the school-climate survey in the formula with chronic absenteeism (students missing more than 10% of school days), and require reporting on targeted measures (teacher advanced credentials, middle-school high-school credit attainment, and FAFSA completion reporting with an opt-out provision). He said the Kentucky Board of Education will begin regulatory readings in late summer with an aim to have percentage weights and formula details ready by the October board meeting.
Committee members pressed Fletcher on technical details. Senator Denine asked how the science requirement in statute would be met when the SAT lacks a science section; Fletcher replied the RFP requires vendors to explain specifically how they will address the science component. Senator West raised concerns that awarding multiple vendors could disrupt longitudinal raw-score continuity across districts; Fletcher acknowledged conversion tables can compare vendors, but raw-score comparisons would be affected and the focus should be on the percentage of students meeting college-readiness benchmarks.
The subcommittee did not take legislative action on the procurement matter during the meeting; Fletcher said KDE would continue technical advisory group consultations over the summer and return with recommended percentages and regulation language for formal board consideration.
