Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Budget Execution topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State budget director outlines allotment rules, public access and oversight
Summary
State budget director John Hicks told the Appropriations & Revenue committee that allotments — quarterly and program-level controls on spending — are central to fiscal control. He said agencies must submit allotment schedules by June 1 and described where the public can find allotment data.
John Hicks, Kentucky's state budget director and secretary to the governor's executive cabinet, told the legislature's Appropriations & Revenue interim committee on July 1 that allotments are the primary mechanism for budget execution and fiscal control once the General Assembly enacts appropriations. He described allotments as two-dimensional: timing (four quarters) and program or organizational breakdowns that operate as the "children of an appropriation."
Why it matters: Allotments determine when and for what purposes agencies may spend appropriated money. They are used by the executive branch to meet the constitutional requirement to end each fiscal year with a balanced budget and by the legislature to receive advanced notice of significant appropriation adjustments. Hicks said quarterly allotment schedules are statutorily required by June 1 so spending on July 1 is governed by the new fiscal year's allotment controls.
Hicks outlined the practical mechanics and transparency tools. He said agencies submit allotment schedules and then the Office of State Budget Director (OSBD) and the Legislative Research Commission (LRC) review and, when necessary, request revisions. Much of allotment management is in the state's financial management system (EMARS); Hicks said EMARS, the operating budget volumes published online, and the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report are public resources for citizens and staff seeking allotment and expenditure data. "If you put $10 million in the first quarter, we'll turn it right back and say, 'Give it to me again,'" Hicks said, illustrating the office's control function.
Committee members pressed operational questions. Senator Nun asked whether a program-specific set-aside (for example, $10 million in a Medicaid-related initiative) would appear as a separate allotment; Hicks said large program aggregates such as Medicaid sometimes embed set-asides, so a new program might not appear as a discrete allotment unless the agency created a chart-of-accounts element or the legislature directed a separate allotment. He advised members and public users to consult the office's published budget books and, when necessary, request data extracts for EMARS to inspect more granular accounting.
LRC staff had previously briefed the committee on the difference between program-level requests and budget-unit appropriations. Jenny Bannister, deputy director for budget review, reminded members that agencies submit detailed program-level requests (baseline, defined-calculation, additional budget requests and capital project requests), but the General Assembly typically appropriates at the budget-unit level. That program detail is used to evaluate requests, while appropriations legally authorize spending at the unit level.
What comes next: Hicks said OSBD and legislative staff will continue to review allotment adjustments through the fiscal year and that the ANR committee receives notices of appropriation increases outside the enacted budget as required by budget language. The committee did not take formal action on allotment policy at the hearing.
