Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Union City to hold public hearing on proposed zoning rules for redemption games
Summary
Union City Borough posted a Sept. 16, 2024, public hearing to consider amendments to Zoning Ordinance #1118 that would define and regulate "redemption games" (games of skill) and add a provision governing accessory structures on adjoining lots. The hearing notice invites public comment and sets the location and time.
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Union City Borough announced a public hearing for 6 p.m. Monday, Sept. 16, 2024, at First Global Methodist Church, 42 East High Street, to solicit public comment on a proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1118.
The posted notice says the amendment would add definitions and regulate permitted-use zones for redemption games, otherwise described as games of skill; add Section 701.04 to provide for the use of accessory structures on adjoining lots; and include a repealer, severability and an effective date provision. The agenda frames the session as an information session and a chance for residents to offer comment.
The borough's public notice states, "The purpose of the hearing is to provide information and receive public comment on the proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1118." The notice gives the meeting location and time but does not list specific sponsors, ordinance text beyond the summary, or any scheduled vote at the hearing.
If adopted, the changes would clarify how the borough treats businesses that operate redemption games (commonly known as games of skill) and set rules for accessory structures on lots adjoining regulated properties. The posted language does not provide detailed zoning map changes, fee schedules, or enforcement mechanisms; those details may be part of the full ordinance text or staff materials that typically accompany a proposed amendment.
The hearing notice serves as the formal opportunity for members of the public to speak for or against the proposed amendment. The agenda does not indicate a decision was made at the time of the posting; any formal vote or next procedural steps were not specified in the posted text.
