Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors debate 'step C' hiring practice and county compensation study; no approvals on pulled step‑C items
Summary
Board discussion and public comment focused on conditional 'step C' salary placements for hard‑to‑fill positions, union concerns about retention/morale, and the county's ongoing compensation study; after debate and public testimony, the board took no action on the pulled step‑C items.
Board members and public commenters spent a substantial portion of the meeting discussing a cluster of consent agenda personnel items that had been pulled for separate consideration because they included conditional higher‑step starting offers (commonly called 'step C').
Supervisor Wilson explained he pulled items 12, 13, 15, 16 and 17 because the step‑C approvals might be redundant once a county‑wide compensation study and pending negotiations with bargaining units are finalized. County HR and department representatives said conditional offers can be extended but remain contingent on board approval; HR indicated past practice sometimes included conditional step placements to recruit for hard‑to‑fill positions.
Union reaction: Norma Williams, chapter president of DNCEA/SEIU, told the board the bargaining unit wants clarity on when and how step placements are set in offers and warned that bringing new hires in at mid‑range can cause retention and morale problems among current employees. Williams urged HR and the board to clarify the practice in upcoming negotiations.
Board response and result: Board members acknowledged the need to complete the compensation study and finish bargaining unit discussions. Supervisors stressed many of the positions are hard to fill and that offers were conditional and contingent on board approval. After discussion and public testimony, no motion passed to approve the pulled step‑C items, so no action was taken on those consent items.
Why it matters: With reported vacancy rates in some departments exceeding 30–40 percent, county leaders are balancing faster recruitment against equity and retention among incumbent staff; the outcome leaves recruitment questions unresolved and signals continued bargaining and policy work ahead.
Speakers quoted (first reference): Norma Williams (DNCEA/SEIU), County HR Director, Supervisor Wilson, Supervisor Short.
Next steps: County HR and bargaining teams are expected to clarify offer practices in negotiations and return recommendations on the compensation schedule and step‑placement procedures.
