Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the DWI Plea topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Defendant pleads guilty to third‑offense DWI; sentencing reset for pre‑sentence report

252nd District Court · June 30, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

In cause 24 DCCR2242 a defendant identified as Mr. Williams pled guilty to a third‑degree felony DWI with two prior convictions; the court accepted the plea, found competency, and reset the matter for sentencing so probation can prepare a pre‑sentence report. The plea package includes a probated 10‑year term, eight years of probation, a $1,000 fine and 10 days upfront.

In cause 24 DCCR2242 the defendant identified in the record as Mr. Williams pleaded guilty to one count of driving while intoxicated (alleged Mar. 31, 2024) with two prior DWI convictions noted (Mar. 28, 2014 and May 2, 2022). The court asked whether the plea was made freely and voluntarily and found that Mr. Williams understood the documents and consequences. The judge said she would find the plea was entered freely and that the defendant was competent and understood the nature and consequences of the plea.

The prosecutor’s package described a recommended disposition that includes a 10‑year term in prison that would be probated (resulting in an eight‑year term of probation), a $1,000 fine and 10 days of upfront time. The judge accepted the state’s exhibit and reset the case for sentencing so that the probation department can complete a pre‑sentence report and provide additional information, including background and potential restitution. The court also cautioned the defendant that a plea of guilty or no contest may have immigration consequences for noncitizens.

Why it matters: The plea resolves a felony DWI charged as a repeat offense and carries a substantial period of probation and fines if the court follows the agreement at sentencing. The probation report requested by the court will provide the judge with additional information before imposing sentence.

The court’s next step: sentencing was reset to a later date after receipt of the pre‑sentence report; defendants and counsel were told to speak with probation on their way out.