Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the E Motorcycles topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears first reading of ordinance to define, restrict high‑powered electric motorcycles
Summary
On first reading, staff told the council Ordinance No. 2,839 would create a new municipal code chapter distinguishing electric motorcycles from e‑bikes and mopeds, limit sidewalk and trail operation, require driver licensing and safety equipment, and provide enforcement tools; no vote on adoption occurred at first reading.
The Enumclaw City Council held a first reading on June 22 of Ordinance No. 2,839, which would add a new municipal code chapter to define and regulate electric motorcycles.
City staff explained the proposed rules are intended to fill a local regulatory gap because many electric motorcycles — including high‑powered dirt‑bike style models — are operated on streets, sidewalks and multi‑use trails and are not clearly covered by current classifications. The staff report noted that recent state legislation has prompted a Department of Licensing work group to develop statewide definitions by October 2027; the ordinance is presented to complement that work and to provide local clarity now.
According to the staff presentation by the Chief, the ordinance would: define electric motorcycles and distinguish them from e‑bikes and mopeds based on power output and speed capability; prohibit operation on sidewalks, parks and multi‑use trails unless specifically authorized; require helmets consistent with state law and lighting/safety equipment for roadway use; require a valid driver’s license when operated on roadways; and create a range of enforcement options, including warnings, citations and vehicle impoundment for repeat or egregious violations.
The staff report said riders are often juveniles or otherwise unlicensed and that the proposed code would give law enforcement clear authority to address unsafe operation. The Chief summarized the purpose: “This proposed ordinance is designed to complement, not conflict with, state law by addressing areas not clearly defined at the state level.”
This was a first reading; no final action or adoption vote occurred on June 22. Councilmembers were told the city's attorney had reviewed the language for consistency with applicable statutes and that the item had Public Safety Committee approval ahead of the council first reading. Further amendments or clarifications may be offered at second reading before any adoption vote.
