Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Property Sale topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Erie County delays vote on selling 13.8-acre parcel near Ed Fennell; council asks for appraisals, wetlands data and realtor input

Erie County Council · April 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council discussed an inquiry about selling county land adjacent to the former Ed Fennell/Pleasant Ridge East site and did not authorize immediate appraisals. Members recommended subdividing or seeking realtor market advice first, studying wetlands and resident impacts, and returning with more detailed options before any sale.

Council members discussed an inquiry about selling roughly 13.8 acres adjacent to the former Ed Fennell (Pleasant Ridge East) site after a potential buyer expressed interest. The presenting member asked for authorization to obtain the two sealed appraisals required by the county administrative code; councilors instead recommended steps to preserve flexibility and community interests before committing funds for appraisals.

Members raised multiple concerns: a large portion of the tract includes wetlands that reduce usable acreage; subdivision of the parcel would be necessary to isolate a saleable portion and to create accurate appraisals; selling land is a one-time revenue event that removes a county asset; and the proximity of the Edna A. Hill Thomas Center means potential buyers or uses could affect vulnerable residents. Several councilors recommended engaging real-estate brokers for a market assessment or subdividing first so appraisals reflect clearly defined lots.

Speakers recalled earlier county efforts to appraise parcels and urged caution about pre-committing to a sale method. Some members said they would prefer a sealed-bid or public-auction approach and opposed private, pre-conditioned sales; others noted that if a bona fide buyer is willing to pay a premium in a public process, that would surface in sealed bids.

Outcome: council did not vote to fund appraisals immediately. Instead, members directed staff to gather additional information — including wetlands mapping, realtor input, potential subdivision configurations and zoning considerations — and to return the item to a future agenda after staff reports back.