Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning & Zoning cites fee revenue gains, POCD timing and open‑space reserve; Horseneck building use questioned
Summary
Planning & Zoning reported increased permit fee revenue after a Jan. 2025 fee increase and proposed one‑third of a $250,000 POCD consultant cost in FY2027; the committee heard a $75,000 open‑space evaluation reserve request and discussed the Horseneck building’s suitability for municipal use.
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning & Zoning and environmental staff told the committee that permit fee revenues have risen materially since a fee increase that took effect in January 2025 and that application volumes are running ahead of the prior year. The committee asked staff to work with the Comptroller to consider revising FY2027 revenue estimates to reflect current run rates.
Staff presented a proposed Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD) 10‑year update and said roughly one‑third of the estimated $250,000 consultant cost is budgeted for FY2027, with the remainder anticipated in FY2028. The Conservation Commission and Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Agency budgets showed minimal changes beyond conversion of a part‑time position to full‑time to serve both departments.
A $75,000 capital request would establish an open‑space evaluation reserve to pay for appraisals and land‑use analyses when acquisition opportunities arise (staff estimated about $60,000 per evaluation). Committee members discussed the proposed demolition of the Horseneck building and whether the temporary site permit limits the building’s suitability for permanent use. Patrick LaRow, Director of Planning & Zoning, said the site was not suitable for residential use but that “use for a municipal facility appeared reasonable given the apparent demand for the space.”
The committee requested benchmarking information on sustainability and energy coordinator positions in comparable municipalities and asked staff to evaluate the ceiling replacement request in the context of related projects and phasing.
