Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Design Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Old Saybrook working group weighs building heights, lot sizes and mixed-use designs
Summary
Members debated draft design standards, favoring mid-size mixed-use and vintage warehouse conversions over large warehouses, proposed a rough 45-foot height ceiling (three–four stories) with facade treatments and asked for fire-department input and a lot-size inventory before next draft.
Casey, a committee member, outlined a draft of design standards and said the group broadly favored mid-size, mixed-use development and adaptive reuse of industrial buildings rather than large warehouse or big-box projects. "I think we were saying about a fourtory max, three to four story max," Casey said, adding she was aiming for roughly 45 feet as a workable top height in many cases.
Why it matters: The group is trying to balance economic reuse and marine/commercial needs with an appearance and scale consistent with the town. Casey said the draft will be checked against existing zone requirements so new rules do not unintentionally force changes to current lots.
Members discussed how to reconcile floor-to-floor heights needed by industrial or marine uses with the visual scale the town prefers. Bruce and other participants argued that some uses—boat storage and maintenance, for example—may require tall single-floor spaces; the group discussed using special exceptions for marine commercial uses so that the town can review height and treatment on a case-by-case basis. "If you have a tall building, you could require treatments so it reads as human scale," one member said.
The committee debated regulatory approaches that incentivize desired outcomes rather than imposing impossible minimums. Casey floated a rough minimum-lot-size figure of about five acres as a threshold that would apply only to new subdivision activity (not existing lots); members asked her to pull a sampling of current lot sizes and compare those numbers to existing zone requirements before settling on a number.
Design details that drew consensus included increasing street-facing glazing, adding facade articulation (awnings, balconies) and locating the majority of parking behind buildings on larger sites to improve walkability. Members favored converted-warehouse examples—with windows and pedestrian entries—over blank metal-sided boxes with garage doors facing the public way.
Safety and process: Members agreed to involve the Old Saybrook Fire Department on questions of life-safety, sprinklers and the practical implications of taller single-floor buildings. Chief Johnson (Old Saybrook Fire Department) had emailed that the fire department wants to be engaged when the group defines building-height and sprinkler policy.
Next steps: Casey said she will expand the draft, review it with Emily and Doug, and return with a comparison to existing zoning and sample lot-size data. The small team will present a refined package to the group at a follow-up meeting scheduled for July 30. The committee also discussed using special-exception criteria to manage marine uses and preserving ARB (Architectural Review Board) advisory input by putting clearer, enforceable glazing and articulation requirements into zoning.
The meeting did not adopt zoning language; members tasked staff and the small drafting team with follow-up work and additional data collection.
