Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debate spotlights Roberts Rules wording; staff says suspending rules requires two-thirds
Summary
Members debated whether the commission's policies should describe suspending rules as a simple majority or a two-thirds vote. A staff speaker read from Robert's Rules of Order and said the established practice calls for a two-thirds vote, prompting members to request an electronic excerpt for the full commission.
The legislative committee spent substantial time on a proposed update to its policies and procedures after commissioners flagged a discrepancy over whether suspending the rules requires a simple majority or a two-thirds vote.
"So, it is in Robert's Rules of Order... that a 2/3 majority vote of the commission elected is needed in order to suspend the rules," a staff member told the committee while reading the relevant guidance. Several commissioners said the draft ordinance had previously read "majority," which prompted confusion when suspensions occurred without the language matching practice.
Committee members asked staff to circulate a page from Robert's Rules highlighting the passage, and the chair said she would send the electronic excerpt to the entire commission. Commissioners discussed that the policy had been circulated for feedback and that only one commissioner had replied by email; several members encouraged a clear process so the policy could be finalized and taken to the full commission.
The committee endorsed sending the revised policy language to the full commission for consideration and requested the staff-supplied Roberts Rules excerpt be shared with all members ahead of Monday's meeting.
The exchange underscored broader concerns raised elsewhere in the meeting about outdated ordinance language and the need for a coordinated schedule to review council rules and code revisions.
