Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Small Area Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Falls Church planners debate open‑space option, zoning approach and protections for Virginia Village redevelopment
Summary
At a July 1 work session, Falls Church planning commissioners reviewed Virginia Village small‑area plan amendments and debated whether to give the open‑space overlay conditional/discretionary review or keep the affordable‑housing path by‑right. Staff said Council asked for a conditional option for the open‑space path; commissioners split on how prescriptive the plan should be.
Falls Church planning staff presented small‑area plan amendments for Virginia Village during a July 1 work session and the commission discussed competing priorities: maximizing affordable housing through a by‑right route, or allowing a conditional/discretionary path for the open‑space option so the city can better protect neighboring Winter Hill residents and guide public‑space outcomes.
Staff planner Zoe summarized recent schedule and edits: the small‑area plan was last seen by the commission on June 3; City Council held a work session June 15 and referred the draft to the Planning Commission on June 22. She noted the draft now explicitly welcomes residential uses in the core commercial area and that edits and new maps were highlighted in red for review. The public hearing will be July 15.
Resident comment and commissioner concerns shaped most of the discussion. A public commenter asked that the plan keep parking structures and service areas away from the Winter Hill edge and step down heights to three stories for the first 30 feet of depth adjacent to residences.
Commissioner Kraner urged the commission to add more specific guidance in the small‑area plan to support later zoning decisions and to ensure protections for adjacent residents — for example, clearer direction about locating parking and back‑of‑house uses away from Winter Hill and specifying screening and transitions. "If we don't have the language here, it makes it harder to guide the zoning and the development review process," he said.
Staff and some commissioners cautioned against over‑specifying the plan at this stage; Commissioner Kinsky and others argued for retaining general guidance so the City Council and future zoning process can consider trade‑offs. Staff said Council granted first reading to the proposed zoning amendments but directed staff to return with an option that would allow a conditional approval for the open‑space overlay so Council could weigh trade‑offs between open space and affordability.
Commissioners’ positions varied: several said they generally supported maintaining a by‑right affordable‑housing path to accelerate housing delivery, while others advocated a narrowly tailored discretionary ("special exception/light special permit") route for the open‑space option to protect neighborhood character. Staff said it would reserve a placeholder in the zoning chapter of the small‑area plan for more specific language once Council and public feedback are reconciled.
Separately, staff presented a housekeeping amendment to Comprehensive Plan Chapter 4 to move four city‑owned Gibson Street parcels from the downtown planning opportunity area into the South Washington Street planning opportunity area so the entire Virginia Village area would be under a single small‑area plan.
In the director's report staff also noted the Park Avenue Great Streets 100% design plans are complete and asked the commission to nominate a representative to the Virginia Village RFP evaluation committee; staff said the committee is expected to meet in August and possibly into September depending on the volume of submissions. Two commissioners expressed interest in serving; staff will confirm scheduling and participation requirements before finalizing the appointment.
The commission will continue review and take formal action after the public hearing scheduled for July 15.
