Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Campground Definition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Louisa County planning commission debates whether 'campground' rules should exclude long-term workforce housing
Summary
At a May work session the Louisa County Planning Commission discussed amending the county zoning code to clarify campground definitions and create a separate temporary workforce-housing classification; staff will draft separate ordinances and standards and return next month.
The Louisa County Planning Commission discussed at length whether to separate the county’s existing campground rules from a new temporary workforce‑housing category, after commissioners said some properties marketed or permitted as campgrounds are being used as long‑term housing for project workers.
Staff told the commission the Board of Supervisors asked the planning commission to review the campground definition and provided a draft that county staff and outside counsel have vetted. “One of the proposals is to limit stays to no more than 60 days in a 12 month period,” the chair said, asking whether that would be a rolling period or a calendar year.
Commissioner Quarles said enforcement is a practical concern: “How is that enforced?” he asked, noting the difference between a short vacation stay and someone living in a trailer for six to eight months. Staff replied that uses would typically come through a conditional‑use permit (CUP) that would be tied to the property and specify an approved capacity and infrastructure requirements.
Several commissioners argued campground language traditionally describes recreational, short‑term use and that the county should create a distinct workforce‑housing definition and standards for longer stays. “I see this as more of a workforce housing issue, not so much a campground, a leisure activity,” one commissioner said, urging separate rules.
Staff warned that once a campground reaches three or more units, Virginia Department of Health standards can apply and that the county would expect appropriate septic, water and electrical infrastructure for longer‑term occupancy. Commissioners and a licensed contractor discussed drain‑field design, pedestal wiring and inspection needs; one commissioner suggested annual site visits by code enforcement as a minimum requirement for permitted workforce sites.
The commission recommended staff draft separate ordinance language for workforce housing — potentially allowing travel trailers while setting higher infrastructure and safety standards than a recreational campground — and to return with a definition, standards and permitting matrix. Commissioners also asked staff to gather examples from local campgrounds and other localities and to include buffering and site‑design guidance.
Staff said it will circulate the presentation materials and come back next month with workforce‑housing language for further review. The commission took no formal vote at the work session.
