Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission recommends rezoning and CUP for large planned-resort project after lengthy Q&A and proffer negotiations

Louisa County Planning Commission · March 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a multi-hour public hearing and technical Q&A, the Louisa County Planning Commission recommended the Board of Supervisors approve rezoning and a conditional use permit for the Where's Crossroads/Tributor planned unit development and a private road waiver, subject to amended conditions and proffers addressing stormwater, land-disturbance phasing, noise and community benefits.

The Louisa County Planning Commission on March 2026 voted to recommend that the Board of Supervisors approve the rezoning and conditional use permit (CUP) requests for the Where's Crossroads/Tributor planned unit development and to approve an associated private-road waiver.

Deputy Director Tom Eglin Jr. opened the project presentation, describing five items the Board will consider: rezoning multiple parcels totaling approximately 393.84 acres to a Plan Unit Development, a multi-use conditional use permit, a private-road waiver, a master-plan amendment and other waivers. Staff said the applicant provided a neighborhood meeting summary, voluntary contributions to public facilities, and a lengthy staff report with recommended conditions.

Applicant Joe Walsh, project director for REEF Capital Partners, described the proposal as a low-density, destination resort with two golf clubs (an existing Cut Along facility and a new course), private club amenities, a spa village, amphitheater, a small-scale helipad, glamping and an indoor gun club. He said the project would rely on an expanded wastewater treatment capacity and VIPTES permitting; REEF had committed $1.5 million for on-site nutrient-credit work and stream restoration as offsets. Project representatives said proffers included roughly $376,000 in voluntary contributions (about $4,700 per unit) and an estimated 69% open-space preservation on portions of the plan.

Public comment split between supporters and concerns: local residents and civic groups (including members of the Lake Anna Civic Association) praised REEF’s previous stewardship at Cut Along and the company’s community contributions; others raised concerns about long-term lake health, pollinator habitat and enforceable commitments for annual environmental funding. Nikki Atwood asked specifically that commitments to Lake Anna stewardship be ongoing and enforceable rather than a one-time donation; Joe Walsh replied that pollinator protections had been written into architectural guidelines and that the applicant would work with the civic association on continuing commitments.

Commissioners focused questions on stormwater and nutrient discharge, DEQ permitting, phased land disturbance, traffic improvements and proffer timing. Staff and the applicant agreed to a phased-land-disturbance limit with a stabilization requirement; staff proposed, and the applicant agreed in concept to, a limit of no more than 100 acres open at one time without stabilization, though commissioners discussed reducing that number depending on sensitive areas. Applicant environmental manager Nate Kizer described on-site stream restoration (about 3,500 linear feet restored) and said the VIPTES permit included state-of-the-art effluent limits and on-site offsets in the watershed.

Other negotiated items included hours and decibel expectations for an indoor shooting range (applicant agreed to meet county decibel standards at property lines and accept Sunday-hour concessions), a definition and notice period for large events (commission suggested adjusting a threshold from 200 to 400 attendees for notification), a commitment to 45 workforce-housing units, and a willingness to dedicate right-of-way for future Newbridge Road improvements as a proffer.

Following discussion and amendments to conditions, the commission made three formal recommendations to the Board of Supervisors: the rezoning (rezoning 2026-01) with the evening’s amendments, approval of CUP 2026-01 with the agreed conditions, and approval of the private-road waiver associated with the project. Miss Johnson called roll for each motion and each carried.

Why it matters: The proposal would add a large, mixed-use resort and associated residential units in a designated growth area; the project has potential economic impacts (construction jobs, ongoing hospitality employment and tax revenue) as well as environmental implications for the Lake Anna watershed and nearby streams.

What’s next: The Planning Commission’s recommendation and the finalized, amended conditions and proffers will be forwarded to the Louisa County Board of Supervisors for a final decision. Additional technical permitting (including VDEQ review for wastewater and stormwater) remains a separate regulatory step.