Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wild And Scenic River topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Christopher Curtis presents Wild and Scenic river designation for Deerfield River; questions raised about infrastructure impact
Summary
At an Aug. 4 Charlemont Selectboard meeting, Christopher Curtis reviewed a Deerfield River Wild and Scenic study, described the federal designation process and benefits, and answered questions about potential effects on bridge and culvert projects; the board asked for further information on impoundment lengths, case studies and likely review timelines.
Christopher Curtis presented a Deerfield River Wild and Scenic study to the Charlemont Selectboard on Aug. 4, describing the criteria for federal designation, potential funding through National Park Service–linked advisory mechanisms and the principal protections the status would provide.
The presentation outlined that designation primarily limits new dams and large water-resource projects and can make local projects subject to National Park Service review. Selectboard member Wilder Sparks asked specifically how long impounded portions of the river are and what that would mean for routine infrastructure work such as bridge or culvert replacements. Ashley Sparks, who identified herself as a member of the Deerfield Wild and Scenic committee, told the board that a recent newspaper article did not reflect committee edits and voiced concern that designation-related reviews could require more scenic, higher-cost bridge designs in lieu of less expensive, functional alternatives.
Curtis said the designation process can be protracted — he noted that the Westfield designation took about 15 years — and that his expectation is the effort could extend beyond the town’s planned Long Bridge replacement in 2027. He also said he believes emergency repairs likely would not be reviewed by the National Park Service even if funded by FEMA, but the board asked him to confirm that point with documentation and case studies. Curtis said he would send information about a Westfield bridge project that involved a design change he did not think raised costs.
The group discussed next steps if Charlemont pursues designation: drafting enabling legislation with Senator Markey or pursuing a Governor-led petition to the Secretary of the Interior. The board requested additional material for the next meeting, specifically answers about impoundment distances, examples of where designation altered bridge or culvert designs, and a clearer sense of timeline and cost implications for local projects.
The Selectboard did not take a vote on the designation at this meeting; members asked Curtis to return with the requested information prior to further action.
