Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves grading permit for backyard patio at 251 Anosi Way with monitoring conditions
Summary
The Springdale Planning Commission approved a grading permit allowing homeowner Adam Hyatt to excavate and expand a sunken patio at 251 Anosi Way, subject to engineer monitoring, a stop-and-plan requirement if unstable conditions are found, and town review of any retaining-wall materials.
The Springdale Planning Commission on July 1 approved a grading permit that will allow homeowner Adam Hyatt to excavate about 10 feet of material behind his house to expand a sunken patio at 251 Anosi Way, provided several conditions are met.
Staff planner Nile Connelly told the commission the engineering drawings show a proposed high cut of just under 10 feet at the rear of the lot and a shorter approximately 4-foot cut nearer the house, and that the applicant supplied a stamped letter saying the excavation will be monitored during construction. Connelly said the engineer "expects the excavation won't need any retaining" but that the plans call for monitoring and that a retaining wall could be required if site conditions differ from expectations.
Adam Hyatt, the applicant, said the intent is "to get a little bit more utilization out of my backyard" and described plans for stairs and a small wall that his homeowners association would also need to approve. Multiple commissioners pressed for clarity about drainage and slope stability, asking whether the project triggered the town's geotechnical-report thresholds in sections of the code addressing slope stability. Staff said the excavation as proposed did not automatically trigger a full geotechnical study but that the code allows the director of community development to require additional analysis where site or soil conditions warrant it.
After discussion, the commission approved the permit while attaching conditions intended to manage risk: the applicant must follow the engineer's recommendations during construction; if loose rock, soil, or inconsistencies in bedrock emerge the slope must be stabilized in accordance with the engineer's recommendations; and if a retaining wall is required the applicant must submit details of wall materials to the town for approval and the wall must comply with the town's architectural standards (section 1016). The motion noted that the engineering drawings and the stamped letter were sufficient for approval given the limited scope of the project.
The approval allows the grading work to proceed with town inspections and an explicit stop-and-plan requirement if instability is detected; any retaining-wall construction above thresholds that trigger permits must be reviewed and approved by staff.
