Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends approval of East Oaks lot split at 1649 East Oaks Drive
Summary
The Fruit Heights Planning Commission recommended approval of a preliminary plat amendment to split the lot at 1649 East Oaks Drive into two parcels, conditioned on geotechnical requirements and future utility stubbing; the commission acknowledged remaining buildability risks and required further site work before a building permit.
The Fruit Heights Planning Commission recommended approval of a preliminary plat amendment that would split the parcel at 1649 East Oaks Drive into two building lots, with staff and commissioners flagging geotechnical and floodplain issues that must be resolved before a building permit is issued.
The commission voted to recommend the preliminary plat after staff described the applicant’s submittal and the geotechnical report. Staff said utilities will not be stubbed for the second lot at this time; a future buyer could install utilities when they choose to develop the parcel, provided the lot meets the plat’s buildable-lot requirements. The commission motioned and adopted the recommendation by voice vote; individual roll-call votes were not recorded in the transcript.
Commissioners pressed staff and the applicant on drainage, creek mitigation and geotechnical uncertainty. The geotechnical report noted evidence of “possible ground shaking, surface folding, tectonic substance and debris flows” and recorded that trenching across the entire lot had not been completed. Staff and the city’s geotechnical consultant said that the incomplete trenching means the lot could be rendered unbuildable if further excavation uncovers hazards; Tim Thompson, the city’s geotechnical engineer, stated the remaining risk is small but real, adding that “it’s unlikely that they’re going to find anything else. They probably would have already found it,” while noting that a final determination will require additional excavation and review at the foundations stage.
Because the geotech work was not completed across the entire lot to avoid impacting neighboring landscaping, staff said the city would follow a two-step approach: issue an excavation permit so the site can be fully inspected in the field and require that a geotechnical engineer sign off on foundation plans before a building permit is issued. Commissioners also discussed creek detention, berming and mitigation measures required by the plat and the geotechnical study.
Next steps: the commission’s recommendation moves the amended plat to the subdivision authority and back to staff for finalization. If a buyer seeks to develop the new lot, they must meet the geotechnical and plat requirements — including any additional excavation, mitigation, and utility stubbing — before the city will grant a building permit.
