Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ulster County panel sends proposed ‘rights of nature’ local law to full legislature amid legal concerns
Summary
The Energy, Environment & Sustainability Committee voted to advance Resolution 7—setting a public hearing on a proposed Local Law No. 1 (a "rights of nature" law)—to the full legislative session while taking no final action on a companion resolution that affirms nature’s inherent worth. Members and the executive raised legal and operational concerns and recommended further drafting work.
The Ulster County Energy, Environment & Sustainability Committee voted on July 1 to advance Resolution 7, which would set a public hearing on proposed Local Law No. 1 (a “rights of nature” law) for Aug. 18, 2026, while deferring final action on a related nonbinding resolution that recognizes nature’s inherent worth.
The committee moved the resolution to the full legislative session after members debated whether to form a subcommittee or working group to refine the law’s language and legal footing. Legislator Nolan, the sponsor of a separate resolution affirming nature’s value, said she still favored a nonbinding resolution but raised concerns about sending a draft law to the public without committee agreement. “I don't think the law is ready to um go to the public because we don't have agreement among the members of this committee about elements that are in the law,” Nolan said.
Deputy Executive Laval told the committee the executive office is wary of the proposed local law. “We absolutely do not think that that's um a constructive use of time um or county resources,” Laval said, arguing the local law could be duplicative of state agency responsibilities and could create new county duties and liabilities that are difficult to anticipate.
Several legislators urged caution but ultimately supported moving Resolution 7 to the full body so the public and the larger legislature can consider it. A motion to adopt Resolution 7 was made and seconded; the chair called for a voice vote and the committee advanced the item for July 14 legislative session consideration. The committee transcript does not include a roll-call tally, only the voice vote and members’ explanation-of-vote remarks.
On the companion item, Resolution 178 (which would recognize the inherent worth of nature and establish a county policy of respect for nature), members agreed to take no action at the meeting and to pursue further drafting and private conversations. Nolan, who authored the resolution, said she would prefer to revise and return it rather than have the committee vote on its current language. “If this does not state well what the environmentalists that we've gathered together … are trying to achieve, then I would just withdraw it,” she said.
What’s next: Resolution 7 was forwarded to the July 14 full legislative session for a public hearing on Aug. 18, 2026; Resolution 178 will be refined off-line and may return to committee in amended form. The committee’s discussion emphasized legal review, potential conflicts with state law, and the need to clarify any new county obligations before moving forward.
Speakers quoted: Legislator Nolan (Legislator), Deputy Executive Laval (Deputy Executive), multiple unnamed legislators during the procedural motion and voice vote.
Votes at a glance: Resolution 7—motion to adopt and send to full legislature (voice vote; transcript records no roll-call tally). Resolution 178—no action taken at this meeting.
