Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Espert Billing Referral topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Panel offers state‑specific guidance on billing, coding and referrals for ESPERT
Summary
Speakers at the HRSA/SAMA webinar advised health centers to check state Medicaid/CPT codes, identify credential and billing constraints for non‑credentialed ESPERT facilitators, and build local referral partnerships and workflows when in‑house resources are limited.
Federal, state and community health center speakers at a HRSA/SAMA webinar offered practical guidance on billing, coding and building referral networks for ESPERT services, stressing that requirements vary by state and by provider credential.
Panelists repeatedly emphasized that billing rules are state‑dependent. Summer Gerald (Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services) advised participants to check which ESPERT charge codes are turned on in their state and noted that Virginia Medicaid has screening‑only and screening‑plus‑brief‑intervention codes as well as psychotherapy codes when ongoing treatment is provided. In contrast, the Virginia panelist also stated that non‑credentialed facilitators cannot bill independently in Virginia.
Karen Hansen (LA Master Community Health Centers) described how her FQHC captures reimbursement: the health center reports screening and intervention activity in UDS reporting lines and captures PPS reimbursement when the screened patient has a qualifying visit. She said that in her California experience primary care settings bill under PPS or existing visit codes for ESPERT services, but several panelists warned that credentialing matters for who may bill CPT or Medicaid codes.
The panel recommended concrete steps for health centers planning reimbursement and referrals: (1) contact state Medicaid and billing offices to confirm local ESPERT charge codes and documentation requirements; (2) map who on staff will perform screening, brief intervention and referral and whether those roles meet billing credentials; (3) where on‑site referral capacity is limited, compile an up‑to‑date referral list with named contacts and language capacity, and streamline handoffs (case managers, transportation supports) to reduce missed referrals; (4) document workflows so that UDS and EHR capture aligns with billing codes and reporting lines.
Panelists acknowledged variation across states and encouraged health centers to consult state guidance and SAMA/HRSA resources. The webinar Q&A included technical discussion of CPT codes, EHR capture of screening events, and outcome measurement approaches for tracking reach and fidelity.
Next procedural steps recommended during the webinar were direct follow‑up with SAMA and state program contacts; presenters said they would share reference slides and contact information after the session.
