Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pinehurst Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves $700 sidewalk credit for six Pinehurst properties
Summary
After staff located a 1991 $4,200 developer deposit, the Village of Jackson Board of Public Works voted June 30 to give six Pinehurst cul‑de‑sac properties a $700 credit each toward a sidewalk special assessment and forwarded the recommendation toward the village board process.
Get email alerts on the Pinehurst Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Village of Jackson Board of Public Works voted June 30 to give each of six Pinehurst cul‑de‑sac properties a $700 credit toward a proposed sidewalk special assessment after staff located a $4,200 deposit made by a developer in 1991.
The decision followed testimony from Jack, the director of public works, who said records show a single $4,200 payment was deposited in 1991 to account for curb, gutter and sidewalk work that was never completed when the road extension through the Oaks of Jackson subdivision did not occur. Jack told the board the village is currently absorbing curb-and-gutter costs for the project and recommended a $700 credit to partially offset the larger five‑foot sidewalk assessment that the six properties would otherwise face.
Resident Jen Betcher, who had signed up to speak for nearby Twin Creeks, Sherman Park and Maple Fields residents, urged coordination on nearby roadwork and described Jackson Drive south as “in rough shape for a few years.” Her remarks had raised the broader question of synchronizing repairs with the neighboring town earlier in the meeting.
Board members debated options including doing nothing, splitting the historic $4,200 among property owners, or treating the committee recommendation as the final step before a formal village board action. A motion was made and seconded to apply a $700 credit to the six properties’ sidewalk assessments; the motion passed by voice vote (no roll-call tally specified). The board directed staff to move the item forward for any required special-assessment public hearing and village‑board consideration.
The board’s action does not itself finalize the assessment; the committee recommended the approach be included in the village’s next steps (resolution and public hearing) and staff noted the historic funds had likely been absorbed into the general fund over many years and could not be fully traced or reinvested retroactively.

