Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tourism topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners debate how to manage hunting-season visitors and capture visitor spending

Daniels County Commission · September 4, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County meeting participants described large numbers of out-of-area hunters who camp along roads, strain services and often avoid rules; the discussion focused on enforcement limits, bed‑tax collection from Airbnbs and whether marketing or fees could shift visitor behavior.

A portion of the Daniels County growth-policy discussion focused on how seasonal hunters affect roads, services and local businesses.

Participants described repeated incidents of out-of-area hunters camping on county roadways, bringing dogs and equipment, and sometimes creating hazards for local farms and equipment. Meeting comments said law enforcement issues occur each year and compliance with local expectations varies.

The county discussed two policy approaches: (1) treating hunting visitors as an economic opportunity—encouraging use of campgrounds, hotels and registered short-term rentals to capture spending—and (2) pursuing enforcement or fee mechanisms (bed taxes, county use fees) to recover costs. The County Attorney was cited as reviewing the legality and enforceability of a county-level fee tied to out-of-county vehicle plates.

Points raised in the meeting: - Visitor behavior: speakers reported hunters are often present on state land and many do not use established campgrounds, which produces enforcement challenges and safety issues for farm traffic. - Tax and fee options: participants asked whether Airbnbs and campgrounds are remitting bed taxes and whether a county use or tourist fee (or stricter enforcement) could be implemented; the County Attorney's office was referenced as examining options. - Economic capture: commissioners and residents discussed working with regional development groups (e.g., Great Northern Development Corporation) on marketing strategies to encourage legal lodging and local spending.

No formal policy change or vote on tax measures occurred at the meeting; commissioners asked staff and the county attorney's office to evaluate legal and enforcement feasibility and to include relevant options in the growth-policy implementation recommendations.

What comes next: staff and legal counsel to review bed-tax compliance for short-term rentals and to report back with legal options and potential enforcement strategies that could be considered during the growth-policy implementation phase.