Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pictometry topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council questions Pictometry cost, nine‑year total and staff access
Summary
Murray officials asked how much Pictometry would cost per year, whether staff member Louise could use it, whether funds exist in her budget and referenced a nine‑year total; no procurement decision was recorded.
Council members raised questions about subscribing to Pictometry at the Feb. 3 work meeting, asking how much it would cost annually and whether 'Louise' could access and use it through her budget.
Why it matters: Pictometry (aerial imagery/land‑information service) can support planning, code enforcement and highway operations, but cost and user access affect whether the town can adopt it.
Details: Meeting discussion referenced per‑year costs, a possible nine‑year total, and whether funds could be identified in Louise’s budget to pay for the service. The transcript does not record a procurement motion, a specific price, or a decision to purchase.
Next steps: Board members did not record a vote or directive in the transcript; additional budget review and cost details will be needed before a purchase can be considered.
