Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sewer Allocation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners steer sewer-allocation policy, keep moratorium while staff prepares metering rules
Summary
After a multi-hour review of sewer capacity and the building moratorium, commissioners directed staff to finalize a sewer-allocation policy that meters new residential sewer allocations (details to follow), keep allocation requests at concept plan stage, and return with draft ordinance changes and a review schedule.
Commissioners at the June 30 Queen Anne's County meeting agreed to direct staff to draft final sewer-allocation and adequate public facilities (APFO) changes after reviewing remaining wastewater treatment capacity and moratorium findings. The discussion, the meeting's longest, centered on how to use roughly 450,000 gallons of remaining permitted capacity (including rerating) among residential, institutional and public-health needs.
Staff described the inventory of remaining capacity and presented options for how to handle new requests. “One of the things we proposed was quarterly restricting applicants … which wasn't well received,” said Steve Kahun, who presented the findings. Commissioners asked whether to meter new residential allocations (rather than allow on-demand requests) and whether allocation requests should remain at concept-plan review or be pushed later in the development process.
Several commissioners said metering makes sense as a way to protect future capacity. Commissioner Jack Wilson urged a cautious approach, noting that unmetered allocation could be rapidly consumed by a single large development. “Metering it out gives flexibility to future citizens,” he said, adding that the county must avoid permanently exhausting limited discharge capacity.
At the same time, commissioners expressed concern about how any cap could affect housing affordability and smaller local developers. Several members said the county must build clear, objective criteria for allocating water to avoid the appearance that the board is “picking winners.” Staff reminded the panel that a recapture (clawback) mechanism already exists to reclaim allocations if projects do not proceed.
On timing, the board favored keeping allocation requests at the concept-plan stage so applicants learn allocation availability early. Commissioners also supported letting projects already in the pipeline secure allocations before any new metering threshold takes effect, then applying metering to newly requested allocations thereafter.
The board directed staff to: prepare the sewer-allocation policy and necessary APFO ordinance language reflecting the commission's preferences; include a schedule for periodic review (staff suggested revisiting the metrics no less frequently than every 10 years or as needed); and return with draft documents for public hearing. Staff will present specific numeric metering options for commissioner consideration at a subsequent meeting.
What happens next: staff will draft the allocation policy and APFO changes, circulate them for public review, and schedule the required public hearings. The moratorium remains in effect until the commission's August meeting while the county finalizes the policy.
