Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Code Compliance Hearing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Special Master upholds tree-pruning citation but reduces fine; dozens of Homestead code cases ruled

Homestead City (Special Master hearing; City Council) · July 2, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a July 2 special master hearing, Homestead found multiple code violations (tree pruning, illegal dumping, unpermitted work). A high-profile pruning citation at 1751 NW 17th St was sustained but reduced to a $375 fine plus $80 administrative fee; other fines and compliance deadlines were issued or adjusted.

Special Master Karen Jenkins presided over a July 2 code compliance hearing in Homestead that covered dozens of civil citations and notices of violation, resulting in a mix of fines, fee reductions and compliance deadlines.

The most contested matter involved a civil citation for tree pruning at 1751 Northwest 17th Street (case CC2600141). Homeowner Steven Shelley contested the citation on three grounds: that the citation failed to state facts constituting reasonable cause, that photographic and scaled measurements do not show more-than-one-third of the canopy was removed, and that the pruning qualified as clearance/hazard mitigation under city code. City staff presented a Google Earth image, on-site photographs and an inspection report asserting the canopy loss exceeded one-third. After hearing the evidence and arguments, Special Master Jenkins found a violation but reduced the original $500 citation to $375 and assessed an $80 administrative fee; she advised Shelley to obtain certified-arborist documentation and receipts to avoid future disputes.

Other outcomes from the hearing included reduced penalties or extended compliance deadlines in mitigation of hardship or prompt corrective action. For example, a $500 tree-abuse citation to Belis Bonia (CC2600113) was reduced to $150 plus an $80 administration fee after the respondent explained financial hardship and cleanup efforts. A case involving unpermitted work (C25080289) was granted a 60-day compliance extension to Sept. 1, 2026 because a permit was on file. A bulk-trash/illegal-dumping matter at a center-median (multiple cases tied to the same pile of debris near Northeast 10th Street) produced multiple citations; several fines were reduced to $375 where the party remedied the condition.

The hearing also returned numerous previously heard matters as affidavits of non-compliance: where permits remained incomplete or work was not corrected, the Special Master either extended compliance windows (commonly 30–90 days) or reimposed daily fines retroactive to earlier deadlines. In cases where property owners produced evidence that violations were corrected before hearing, the Special Master sometimes reduced or waived the monetary portion of the citation while still recording compliance obligations and an $80 administrative fee.

Special Master Jenkins repeatedly emphasized that the burden of proof is on the city to show a violation and encouraged property owners to obtain professional documentation (arborists, permit receipts) if they plan future work. Many defendants were advised to maintain contact with their assigned code officer while waiting for permit processing. The hearing adjourned at 4:39 p.m.

The rulings recorded were based on the evidence and testimony presented at the hearing; affected property owners may have statutory rights of appeal under the local process if they choose to pursue them.