Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Douglas County previews large rewrite of Title 20 zoning code; public workshops planned
Summary
County planners and consultants presented the first articles of a consolidated repeal-and-replace of Title 20 (zoning and land‑use code), including a master list of definitions, consolidated use table and a public‑workshop schedule through September; staff sought commissioner direction on focus areas and will return with redlines for board review in the fall.
Planning staff and consultants presented an extensive, multi‑article reorganization and update of Douglas County’s Title 20 land‑use code. The proposed structure moves from scattered chapters to a clearer article format that consolidates definitions, growth management, zoning districts, land‑use regulations and design standards. The stated goals are to remove contradictions, improve readability, centralize definitions, and bring some currently separate design standards into Title 20 to avoid cross‑document inconsistencies.
Kate Moris O’Neal (Principal Planner) and consultant Amarie Lane described key elements in the early articles: a single master definition section, a consolidated land‑use table (alphabetized for ease of use), a quick‑reference chart for each zoning district, and graphics to illustrate dimensional standards. Planners emphasized removing subjective text from definitions (for example, moving regulatory standards out of definition blocks and into implementation sections) and adding new, explicit definitions where the code referred to uses that are not currently defined (cluster development, grading over specific volumes, etc.).
Staff reported extensive public outreach to date, including online surveys and public workshops, and a timeline of workshops through September (next public workshop July 15 at CVIC Hall; planning commission sessions and an anticipated Nov. board reading for the consolidated draft). Staff flagged RV and trailer storage, night‑sky/lighting, and new event‑venue uses as topics generating community comment and asked the board for policy direction on where to focus standards and clarifications. A Title 20 website and a tracking spreadsheet of public comments will be kept current so residents can see how suggestions are handled.
Board members and members of the public urged precision and minimized subjectivity in definitions and enforcement language, asked that outreach be targeted to community neighborhoods, and recommended that new or novel land‑use categories (for example, accessory rural event venues or farm‑to‑table commercial activities) be handled with careful, site‑specific standards or special‑use permitting rather than unconstrained by‑right allowances.
Next steps: staff will continue workshops and planning‑commission review over the summer, post materials to the Title 20 website, incorporate feedback, and return with a consolidated redline and ordinance package for board consideration in the fall/winter cycle.
