Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Planning And Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Camellia Row PUD amendment receives first reading after no public comments at Richmond Hill meeting

City of Richmond Hill Mayor and Council · February 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a Feb. 19 special meeting, the Richmond Hill City Council opened a public hearing and held a first reading on a PUD amendment for the Robertson Tract (Camellia Row); no members of the public spoke and no final adoption was recorded.

The Richmond Hill City Council opened a public hearing and held a first reading on a planned-unit-development amendment for the Robertson Tract, known in the record as Camellia Row, at a special-called meeting on Feb. 19, 2026. The hearing was opened at 6:08 p.m.; no one spoke for or against the amendment and the hearing was closed at 6:09 p.m.

Councilmember Cindy Hatala moved to approve the meeting agenda at the start of the session; Councilmember Kevin Bowes seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Councilmember Steve Scholar gave the invocation and Councilmember Van Hunter led the Pledge of Allegiance.

The PUD amendment was placed on first reading during the meeting. The record does not show a final vote to adopt the amendment at this session. The council adjourned at 6:10 p.m. after a motion to adjourn by Councilmember Steve Scholar, seconded by Councilmember Cindy Hatala; that motion also carried unanimously.

The meeting’s attendance line lists Kristi Cox as mayor and Councilmembers Cindy Hatala, Kevin Bowes, Van Hunter and Steve Scholar as present; City Clerk Dawnne Greene attested to the minutes. The written record also contains a line stating "Mayor Carpenter called the meeting to order," a discrepancy noted in the official minutes; this article follows the meeting’s recorded attendance list rather than assigning the call to order to either name.

No additional materials, vote tallies on the PUD amendment, ordinance numbers, or formal adoption motions for the PUD amendment were included in the meeting record.