Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Technology Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Manhattan-Ogden USD 383 board removes mandatory iPad language from technology handbook, 5–1
Summary
The Manhattan-Ogden USD 383 Board of Education approved amendments to the district technology handbook that rescind a sentence read as a mandatory one-to-one iPad policy, a change supporters said preserves administrative flexibility; the motion passed 5–1 after members debated policy versus operational control.
The Manhattan-Ogden USD 383 Board of Education voted 5–1 to approve the district’s technology handbook while striking a sentence that had been interpreted as committing the district to a mandatory one-to-one iPad deployment for every student. Madame President Kate moved the change and Kurt seconded the motion; the board approved it following discussion about governance and operational discretion.
Supporters of the amendment said the revision retains the district’s ability to supply devices without binding future boards or staff to a specific device choice. "I'm not saying we're not doing iPads, we're not doing one-to-one anymore," Madame President Kate said when explaining the motion. She said the language was being adjusted to give the district flexibility on device choice and age-appropriate screen-time decisions.
Opponents said the board should avoid revising language that has long guided classroom technology. In debate, one member warned that the board risks micromanaging implementation if it changes policy wording too precisely: "I feel like we're getting in the weeds on this and it's not our role to dictate the how," the member said, arguing administration should lead device-level decisions.
Board members discussed alternatives such as considering Chromebooks for older students and raised concerns about younger students’ screen time and the district’s role in stewarding taxpayer resources. The motion carried with five votes in favor and one opposed.
The board adopted the handbook as amended. The district indicated this item was intended to give future boards and administrators flexibility about device type, deployment timing and age-appropriate practices rather than to end device programs immediately. The board will continue to consider implementation details and operational procurement through administration and future meetings.
