Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fire And Ems topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees approve equipment upgrades, MEDIC/pumper bids and personnel promotions as EMS billing dispute continues
Summary
Throughout 2002 trustees approved replacements and upgrades for EMS and fire equipment, accepted bids for a new medic and a pumper, promoted and hired staff, and recorded persistent disagreement with Columbus over EMS mutual‑aid billing.
Norwich Township trustees approved multiple fire and emergency medical services (EMS) procurements and personnel moves in 2002 while noting an ongoing dispute over mutual‑aid billing with Columbus.
Equipment approvals: Trustees authorized purchase or repair of specialized firefighting and rescue equipment through the year — from air cascade systems and LifePak 12 monitors to a new copy machine and replacement HURST pump — citing safety and manufacturer support concerns.
Apparatus procurements: Bids for replacement vehicles and apparatus were solicited and acted on during 2002. The board accepted a Horton Emergency Vehicles bid for a new medic ($153,913 with trade‑in) and later opened a Sutphen Corporation bid for a new Deluge pumper ($379,324 with trade‑in) with the chief recommending acceptance. For both purchases the chiefs examined specifications and recommended awards to meet operational needs.
Personnel and organization: Trustees approved promotions and hires during the year. After Captain Michael Massie’s retirement the board promoted John King to captain and Joe Russell to lieutenant; they hired firefighter David Baird and added an administrative assistant (Lisa Carter) in August. In late 2002 trustees approved hiring additional firefighters effective early 2003 to increase staffing and reduce overtime.
EMS billing dispute: Township leaders recorded disagreement with Columbus over mutual‑aid EMS billing and resolved that Norwich Township would not seek to bill residents for runs transported by Columbus. Washington Township indicated it would limit mutual‑aid transports for billing reasons; trustees discussed reordering run cards and retaining cooperative operations without pursuing resident billing.
Why it matters: The equipment and vehicle procurements and staffing decisions directly affect emergency response readiness and budget priorities; the EMS billing dispute involves interagency mutual aid and revenue/expense allocation that can change how responses are dispatched and paid.
What’s next: Chiefs were to finalize bids and purchase orders, complete vehicle build timelines, and trustees to monitor costs and the status of interagency EMS billing arrangements.
