Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Proposed 72-unit Arcadia Meadows housing project presented; council takes no action after no motion
Summary
Representatives for Woda Cooper presented plans for Arcadia Meadows, a proposed 72-unit multifamily development at 440 Robbins Road and requested a resolution of support plus a $250 development-fee waiver; the council heard the proposal but the item died for lack of a motion.
Developers for a proposed 72-unit multifamily complex called Arcadia Meadows presented plans to the Athens City Council on Feb. 9 and asked for a council resolution of support and a $250 development-fee waiver. The council received the presentation but did not move the item, and it therefore died for lack of a motion.
Omar Sarig and Harrison LaHaie of Woda Cooper described the proposed development as three-story walk-up buildings with a detached clubhouse. The unit mix would include 24 one-bedroom units, 32 two-bedroom units and 18 three-bedroom units. The presenters said rents would range roughly from $395–$880 for one-bedrooms, $470–$1,020 for two-bedrooms and $530–$1,170 for three-bedrooms, with a majority of units toward the higher end of those ranges.
Sarig and LaHaie cited a 2025 housing study they said showed affordability constraints and limited rental availability in Athens. They said home prices had increased "25% year-over-year" and that homeowners were spending about "31% of their income" on mortgages. The developers estimated a total project investment of approximately $20 million and projected annual property tax payments from the developed site of about $85,000 compared with roughly $712 currently being paid on the undeveloped parcels.
The presenters described a tenant-screening program that includes criminal and credit checks, and they said Woda Cooper intends long-term ownership and property management. The developers requested council support and a $250 development fee waiver. Council members asked questions during the presentation, but no council member made a motion to adopt a resolution; the item therefore died for lack of a motion and no formal council position or financial incentive was adopted.
Because the council did not act, the developers may pursue next steps outside of a city-sponsored resolution, and any future requests for fee waivers or incentives would need to return as a new agenda item for council consideration.
