Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Seabeds Redevelopment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Needham redevelopment (Seabeds/Lynen phase 1A): HUD approvals, contractor savings, costly reserves and relocation plans shape timeline
Summary
Cambridge and Needham housing officials told the committee the Seabeds redevelopment is advancing—contractor bids came in below estimate, enabling a direct solar purchase—but HUD approvals, reserve requirements and relocation costs have driven per‑unit development costs above typical thresholds and made state funding outcomes decisive.
Cambridge Housing Authority and Needham Housing Authority staff gave a detailed update on the Seabeds redevelopment (phase 1A), including construction bidding, HUD approvals, relocation planning and why per‑unit costs appear high.
Matt Zjac, deputy director for planning at the Cambridge Housing Authority, said the project scope includes building safety and integrity work (including a roof replacement funded by $84,000 in Community Preservation Act money), apartment livability upgrades and sustainability measures. He said a general contractor was provisionally selected after a competitive process and that the final bid came in at about $12.2 million, down from a $12.8 million pre‑bid estimate; the savings allowed the housing authority to switch from leasing a solar system to directly purchasing a larger array.
On schedule, Zjac said HUD approvals are the critical path. "This transaction is well within the rules of the RAD program and it's the kind of project they want to see happen," he said, but added that HUD is operating slowly and the team now expects financing closing in late August rather than earlier in the summer. The team emphasized the timing shift is a pacing adjustment, not a change to project eligibility.
The relocation plan will be executed in phases so only one building is under construction at a time, allowing most residents to move to on‑site units ('musical chairs') where possible. Zjac said that approach limits impact to roughly 10–12 residents per phase; residents who opt to relocate off‑site may be displaced for longer (some could be out for 12–16 months depending on choices).
Staff announced project staffing changes: the previous project manager, Christian ABNE, has left; Franny Woo (from the Chinatown Community Land Trust) will be the visible project manager on site and oversight will be provided by Margaret Donnelly Moran, a long‑time housing authority leader.
Betsy Collins of PBD Properties gave a related funding update: the project submitted applications to the Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities (EOHLC/HLC) rental housing and a public‑housing innovation (PHI) round and applied for MassDevelopment site‑readiness and Housing Choice grants. Collins said the project received a Notice of Anticipated RAD Rents (NAR) for 41 units and that HUD’s May 12 termination of the Restore/Rebuild program matters—projects that met two grandfathering criteria (approved NAR and active tax‑credit review) can remain eligible; this project meets those criteria.
Collins explained why development costs appear elevated: tax‑credit underwriting requires large operating reserves (about $960,000) and a year‑of‑completion reserve (about $800,000), the sponsoring authority must replenish federal operating reserves (about $852,000), Davis‑Bacon wage premiums increase labor costs, and relocation costs are substantial (roughly $2.5 million). She summarized: when those non‑brick‑and‑mortar costs are added to construction, the per‑unit figure approaches the $855,000 discussed in the meeting.
Committee members and staff asked about contingency plans if state funding does not materialize. Collins said there is no full 'Plan C' but there is a path to complete phase 1B without Restore/Rebuild; securing 40 project‑based subsidies from another source remains the principal unresolved need.
The committee thanked departing staff and asked for continued updates; presenters said they will return with further materials as approvals and funding decisions proceed.
