Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Proposal to merge planning board and board of adjustment advances for study; ordinance possible Oct. 16 introduction

Township Committee of the Township of Lebanon · October 2, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A committee member proposed consolidating the planning board and the board of adjustment into a single joint land use board to save administrative costs and streamline planning review; members discussed statutory mechanics, membership size and timelines and asked for an ordinance template and notifications to current board members.

At the Oct. 2 meeting a committee member proposed merging the planning board and the board of adjustment into a joint land use board to reduce duplicate administrative effort and cut costs for secretarial services and meetings.

Proponents said the township has had few planning applications this year and combining boards could reduce idle meetings and make the township’s professional services (planner, board attorney, engineer) more uniform. Committee members discussed statutory constraints under the Municipal Land Use Law, membership differences (planning boards commonly have nine members; zoning/board-of-adjustment bodies typically have seven), and the need to adopt an ordinance and reappoint members to a new body if the change proceeds.

"I think it makes sense to combine the 2 into a land use for it," one committee member said, arguing consolidation would save time and expense. Others cautioned about volunteer availability and noted some residents prefer having two separate hearings for procedural reasons. Mark (committee attorney) outlined the mechanics — an ordinance is required, appointments must be made, and certain parties (for example, the mayor or council members) may need to recuse on use-variance matters.

Committee members agreed to explore templates (examples from other municipalities were suggested) and to notify existing board members about the proposal. The committee discussed aiming to introduce an ordinance on Oct. 16 with an effective date to be determined if the ordinance is adopted and appointments completed.

No ordinance was adopted Oct. 2; committee members directed staff and counsel to prepare draft language and to provide notice to the boards ahead of any formal introduction.