Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Appointments topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

South Plainfield council confirms appointments, approves professional contracts and swears in municipal judges

South Plainfield Borough Council · January 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The South Plainfield Borough Council approved a package of appointments and one-year professional-service contracts, confirmed municipal judges and other appointees in unanimous roll calls, and adjourned after a public-comment period with no speakers.

The South Plainfield Borough Council approved a slate of appointments and professional-service contracts and administered oaths to multiple appointees, including two municipal judges, during a routine meeting.

The council voted unanimously on a series of resolutions that included council and mayoral board appointments, the hiring of professional contractors and legal counsel, and the confirmation of municipal judges. Motions on individual resolutions and omnibus packages were carried by 5-0 roll calls called by the municipal clerk.

Why it matters: The confirmations install the borough’s legal, planning and advisory advisers for the coming term and authorize one-year professional contracts that allow the borough to continue using outside counsel and engineering services.

What the council did: The meeting record shows the council approved Resolution 26-04 (council appointments to advisory boards and commissions), Resolution 26-05 (mayoral appointments), a package of professional-service appointments and contracts (Resolutions 2606–2623), the appointment of a municipal judge under Resolution 26-24, and a conflict municipal judge under Resolution 26-25. The council also approved an omnibus block of resolutions labeled 26-26 through 26-55; the clerk noted that Resolution 26-55 had been added verbally to the package.

Several roll calls were recorded as unanimous. For example, the clerk recorded votes of 'yes' from the five voting members (appearing in the transcript as Councilman McConville; Councilman Smith; Councilman White; Councilman Bulock; and the council president) on multiple motions.

Appointments and oaths: The agenda and roll call list many appointees by name. The meeting transcript records municipal judges Paul Garlic and an appointee listed in the agenda as "Emanuel Sanchez, Esquire." The oath transcript records that surname as "Manuel Sanchez" during the swearing-in exchange; the meeting record therefore contains both spellings. Both individuals were sworn in during the meeting and received congratulations from the presiding official.

Other named professionals and firms read into the record included Edward Santoro (public defender), D. Francisco Baitman (redevelopment counsel and tax-appeal counsel in some listings), MJ Planning (borough professional planner and special affordable-housing planner), McMahon/Scotland (bond/conflict counsel in the agenda), and consulting and engineering firms (TNM Associates and others). Several individual advisory-board appointees were read aloud, including Richard Wolf, Len Miller, Shannon Jeff, John Ferguson, Paul Zawaki, Laura Loto, Dennis Haydo, Scott Miller and April Wnik.

Public comment and next steps: The council opened a public-comment period for three minutes per speaker but recorded no in-person or online speakers and closed the period. The meeting concluded after the council moved to adjourn.

Note on transcript variations: The meeting transcript contains inconsistent spellings for some names and titles (for example multiple variants for the council president’s name and for the spelling of the conflict municipal judge’s given name during the oath). Where possible the article uses names as they appear in the agenda and notes discrepancies recorded in the oath transcript rather than choosing one spelling over the other.

The council adjourned following the final roll call and the meeting record indicates no substantive policy debates or public-testimony exchanges during the session.