Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Finance director reports early revenue gains; board briefed on referendum timing and middle-school bond context

Anderson District 3 School Board · February 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Finance staff reported a $2.66 million year-to-date surplus driven by property tax timing and previewed state factors affecting next budget (teacher-pay proposals, enrollment sensitivities). The superintendent and staff outlined how homestead-exemption proposals and an impending sales-tax vote could affect a planned middle-school bond.

Finance director Matthew Moore reported to the board that, through January, revenues exceeded expenditures by $2,657,623, driven primarily by the timing of property-tax collections. Moore cautioned that month-to-month revenue can swing due to collection timing and enrollment-weight calculations but said the district was ahead of last year by roughly $1.6 million through mid-January.

Moore also reported the district’s January sales-tax allocation was $289,368.70, with $57,873 allocated to debt service. He said February collections traditionally reflect December spending and will be an important data point for budgeting.

On state-level items, Moore described a proposed $2,000 increase to the state minimum teacher salary and said the state had allocated about $150 million for that increase; he estimated the district’s fiscal exposure to a full $2,000 increase (including fringe benefits for staff on the teacher schedule) could be roughly $550,000. He also listed projected costs for step increases and other budget drivers and noted changes to weight-of-pupil calculations could reduce state aid by approximately $75,000 in the district.

Superintendent remarks put the budget discussion in referendum context: the superintendent said increases in the homestead exemption at the state level could shift tax burdens and explained worst-case homeowner impact estimates for a bond scenario and the expected two-year lag before bond proceeds are spent. Staff emphasized that potential county-level or state funding changes (including a proposed penny sales-tax vote in 2028) could significantly alter taxpayer impact.

The board discussed community outreach for the middle-school project and scheduled trade-partner and community meetings to explain procurement opportunities and project costs. A fly-through of an early building design was shown and staff said the cafeteria will serve as an auditorium-type space while a separate fine-arts center could be a later phase.

Next steps: staff will continue budget modeling as state guidance arrives, publicize community outreach on the middle-school project and return with refined homeowner impact estimates and final budget proposals.