Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission debates off-street parking rules, maps possible code tweaks
Summary
Staff presented a review of the borough—off-street parking standard (600-foot rule); commissioners discussed mapping results showing limited downtown impact, the option to raise the radius to 700 feet, and longer-term ideas such as new lots or shifting from minimum to maximum parking standards.
The Planning Commission reviewed off-street parking and loading standards and debated modest code changes and long-term options.
Joe, Staff member, presented the review of the borough—parking standard (chapter 27, part 11, section 1102), including a GIS exercise that drew 600-foot radii from public lots. "When you look at it it's pretty interesting to see that really it's only two areas of the borough that the parking standards really to be applicable," Joe said, noting Brookfield North on Washington Avenue and the Baldwin Street lot as the main downtown areas affected.
Several commissioners said the 600-foot rule feels arbitrary and suggested increasing the radius to 700 feet to capture nearby businesses, particularly around Baldwin Street. "If you increase it to 700 ft it takes you over the pool hall," one commissioner said, arguing it would better align the ordinance with actual walking patterns.
The commission discussed more comprehensive alternatives: adding a municipal parking lot, adopting zoning overlays similar to Pittsburgh's parking zones, or examining a switch from minimum parking requirements toward maximums in denser downtown settings. Commissioners cautioned that any change should be studied for operational effects and business impacts.
Why it matters: Off-street parking standards affect downtown development feasibility and business operations; small code changes can shift where parking obligations fall and where public parking demand increases.
What comes next: Commissioners asked staff to contact state planning resources and comparable municipalities for real-world case studies and to return with maps and options for a measured code amendment rather than a radical overnight change.
