Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pedestrian Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission reviews PennDOT midblock crossing suggestions after residents cite poor sight lines
Summary
Bridgeville commissioners reviewed PennDOT recommendations for a midblock pedestrian crossing and heard residents say painted lines and poor sight lines are unsafe; staff noted PennDOT standards and the commission asked about lighting and different striping patterns.
The Bridgeville Planning Commission reviewed a PennDOT‑sourced report on a midblock pedestrian crossing and heard residents and commissioners raise safety concerns about sight lines, lighting and the effectiveness of painted crosswalks.
One resident criticized reliance on paint alone: "The white paint does not save a life," the resident said, urging more substantial countermeasures such as different striping patterns, lighting improvements or pedestrian islands.
Staff said the report recommended signage and that rapid‑flash beacons were an option for higher‑visibility treatments; the materials do not require the commission to act immediately but offer choices for a local implementation plan. Commissioners noted jurisdiction questions (state vs. county vs. borough) on maintenance and legal crosswalk placement and asked staff to explore whether different paint patterns or additional lighting would be permissible under PennDOT standards.
Why it matters: The crossing serves a frequently used pedestrian route between downtown destinations; improved visibility and durable treatments can reduce pedestrian risk at midblock locations.
Next steps: Staff will follow up on recommended striping patterns, lighting options and the jurisdictional responsibilities for installation and maintenance, and return to the commission with possible measures.
