Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking Requirements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public urges Bridgeville commission to drop parking minimums; members agree to study maximums
Summary
At a Bridgeville planning meeting, a public commenter urged removal of off‑street parking minimums, citing development constraints; commissioners agreed to study possible maximum standards, shared‑parking rules and a 500‑foot parking‑supply map.
A public commenter told the Bridgeville Planning Commission that the borough should abandon rigid off‑street parking minimums, arguing businesses can and will provide reasonable parking without a rule that ties spaces to square footage.
"You do not need to regulate how many parking spaces a business needs to have," the commenter said, urging the commission to consider removing parking space requirements in certain districts so development is not constrained.
The comment came during the commission's review of Chapter 27, Part 11, Section 1102 of the borough code, the section that sets minimum parking standards. Commissioners and staff recounted that those numbers were set decades ago by consultants and that the rules now create predictable conflicts — for example, how to treat nearby public lots and whether businesses may share surplus spaces.
The Chair noted the code already allows special exceptions and shared‑parking arrangements in some cases and summarized an example offered in discussion: "The Marquee Lounge was obligated to have 16 parking spaces so he had a surplus of like 27," the Chair said, describing how surplus parking at one business can be relied on by another under current practice when the special‑exception criteria are met.
Commissioners did not vote on any code changes. They instructed staff to research modern alternatives, including the idea of capping maximum parking, mapping public and private parking within a 500‑foot radius of commercial areas, and assembling options for next meetings. "We're going to look into maximum parking regulations and the 500‑foot mapping," the Chair said, describing the data the commission requested.
Why it matters: Minimum parking requirements affect how much land businesses must dedicate to parking, which influences site design, paving, stormwater and walkability. Changing those rules can reduce paved surface area in new development, encourage shared parking strategies and affect neighborhood parking pressure.
Next steps: Staff will produce a report and a map of nearby parking supply and present options to the commission for further discussion and potential code amendments.
