Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Finance update: tax revenue correction, athletic-field costs and board concern over change orders

Cherokee County School Board of Trustees · February 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the Feb. 9 meeting finance staff corrected tax revenue numbers and reported $11.25 million in total athletic-field costs with a $520,000 construction change-order; trustees raised concerns about change-order approvals and said they first read about the work in a local paper.

Finance staff told the Cherokee County School Board on Feb. 9 that the packet’s revenue numbers were incomplete: the district collected $56 million in tax revenue through Jan. 31 after a $17 million January distribution, Mr. Pettit said, correcting an earlier figure of $38 million.

Mr. Pettit also summarized operating expenses (about $8.78 million through Jan. 31) and reported a net change in fund balance of roughly $3.7 million. He walked trustees through expense categories and offered to present a services/supplies breakdown if the board wanted more detail.

The meeting moved to the district’s recent athletic-field construction: Mr. Pettit gave project totals of about $11.25 million (including nearly $948,000 in architect and design fees) and said construction change orders accounted for a $520,000 increase beyond the original GMP. He said some approvals had been executed informally or by email before formal paper documentation was processed and offered to provide contingency and change-order logs for both Gaffne and Blackburg projects.

Several trustees said they learned about the change orders from a newspaper report before discussion with staff and expressed frustration that formal notification and approval processes were not clear. Staff attributed the largest change-order items to architect omissions and to owner-requested items such as laser grading, sprinkler updates and updated scoreboards; Mr. Pettit and staff committed to deliver a contingency log and to classify each change-order line as an architect omission or owner-initiated change.

Follow-up: finance staff will provide the contingency/change-order log and a line-item breakdown identifying whether each change was an architect omission or an owner-requested addition. No further formal board action was taken on the construction items at the Feb. 9 meeting.